Residents gather enough petitions to assure upcoming referendum is binding.
This item is available in full to subscribers.
To continue reading, you will need to either log in to your subscriber account, or purchase a new subscription.
If you are a current print subscriber, you can set up a free website account and connect your subscription to it by clicking here.
If you are a digital subscriber with an active, online-only subscription then you already have an account here. Just reset your password if you've not yet logged in to your account on this new site.
Otherwise, click here to view your options for subscribing.
Please log in to continue |
ROCHELLE — It appears that the voting results of the upcoming April 2 referendum will be the sole determining factor on whether or not a community recreation center will be built in Rochelle in the next year.
At a special park board meeting on Jan. 7, Flagg-Rochelle Park District commissioners unanimously approved a proposal to ask voters through a referendum vote for authority to issue general obligation bonds in the amount of $14 million to build and equip a recreation center on the April 2, 2019 consolidated election ballot.
However, in a second move, board members also voted 5-1 in favor of passing an ordinance that authorizes the district to issue alternative revenue bonds not to exceed $14 million for the same purpose of building and equipping a recreation center.
The dual actions gave district leaders two different paths in an effort to possibly secure tax payer funding for constructing a community recreation center planned on the south property of the Helms Athletic Complex next to Walgreens. Passing both options enabled the district to put the issue to voters in 2019, rather than waiting until 2020 and risking higher project construction cost bids, but it also left open the possibility the board could legally issue the bonds regardless of referendum results.
The difference in the two options is not only the type of bonds being issued (general obligation vs. alternate revenue), but also how Flagg Township voters participate in the process. A referendum proposition is decided during an election by yes or no simple majority vote, while the ordinance requires a minimum of 7.5 percent (or 526) of current registered Flagg voters to petition the district and force the issue to be put on the ballot.
A public legal notice related to the alternative revenue bond ordinance was published in the Jan. 9 edition of the Rochelle News-Leader, which explained the legal process and gave registered Flagg Township voters 30 days to petition the park district and basically force a binding referendum on the matter.
Since that time, local resident Christa Seebach, who is also a former park board member from 2011-15, spearheaded an effort to gather petitions to assure all Flagg Township voters would have a say in whether tax dollars can be increased to pay for the proposed facility.